There was a slight flicker of the overhead florescence lights a split second before the main laser fired, the instrumentation churned computers began tabulating the various power factors and the printers began their print run of data sheets. Brent did not even bother to look at them, realizing form the TV monitor that the experiment had failed yet again. With a heavy heart he began the laborious task of debriefing made only more disheartening because he knew his job was on the line. Beginning with a close check of the strain gauge sensors. Apart from the high velocity impact of photons on the target area from the three-megawatt laser which as he had expected the sensors had picked up, the target had not reacted in any way, there was

Example if you were to save the above material on a C.D. disc, and more of the same until the disc was full, based on the outline enclosed, [ increased computer storage patent ] it would be possible to encode a similar file with a completely different content, whilst retaining the above file, in addition you could then record any amount of files on the same C.D. disc / hard disk whilst each file would have a individual identity. and be able to be accessed at will.

For those with a digital / computer back ground, the question then is asked were is the extra storage space, The answer to this is that there is no extra storage space, all of the addition data / files are encoded in the first full disk of material or even on a blank disc, but to make it easier to understand we will say for now the additional files are hidden within the information contained within the first file, and is stored and recovered in the following manner.

a small black box is required for the following function within this black box is the instruction program required to achieved the above, the box will be a stand alone plug in unit to any computer and essentially it is a encoding /encryption / error coding device

Take the first word INSTRUMENTATION as in file No 1

And we are now writing file No 2 and are first word in our new file is the word INSTRUCTION. Therefor our little black box says locate the first word stroke character beginning with T and add a code prefix designating this file is file No2 lets say *t / and then the first character / word beginning with N and prefix it with *N and so on for the complete word.

Now when we say we wish to read file one the black box says read every thing that has no prefix, and when we say read file two it says read everything with a pre fix of this degeneration.

We are not writing a whole new file, we are using the old file and the letters of the old file, and the black box is saying 1^st pick out the correct character for our new word in our new file, from the first available character from the underlying files or files and give it a degeneration. In this way all the new information being type in whilst the same key is depressed i.e. the letter T the black box knows this is file No 2 and has added a prefix to the first available T character in so doing their may be many spaces between letters forming words and as files are added the prefix coding may become elaborate , the speed of computers nowadays are such that choosing the correct letters from the old file may leave gaps this is no problem for a high speed computer, in addition to which the error coding helps to reduce the spacing produced by the computer looking for the next available character and its position.

A very simple analogy would be a anagram were the word or words form another meaning, and once we have our second meaning we Tel the computer to remember the two meanings by a code which we can access i.e. file 1 or file two and all in this file has a prefix or series of prefixes saying what it is and were it is in the disk.

In this manner we can write one file and remenipulate the data to create a entirely different file. Further more we do not have to have our black box work out the logic for each letter, it works it out for one letter in this case say the letter T and any Ts in the rest of the text follows automatically.

It is then argued that the encoding of prefixing letters of the old file to create new words in a new file, will require so much coding / computer space / time, that we end up with no additional storage space indeed we would require more space.

Not so, for the following reasons.

1. Once the black box has transposed a letter by a addition of a prefix code, in a new file it dose so for the entire alphabet in the new file from then on it’s a simple electronic manipulation not a processing problem.

2. The computer recognisers any key depressed, mearly add a prefix by the simple encoding system and the rest is a hard wired solution, not requiring any processing other then initlizeing the new file.

3. Again for longer bits of coding the operation needs only be done once for each letter in the alphabet once a new file is created the rest is a hard wired operation.

Conclusion.

1. Very little extra processing power is required

2. 2. The storage space of the new file is encrypted / embedded in the text of the old file and can be retrieved at will

3. The position of a new letter upon the disk , and the new prefix code needs to be determined, but the computer already performs this operation the only additional work is in the coding and this coding i.e. the prefix is read from the new file not stored in a new storage space .

I.e. the old world say THEY and the new word in the new file say *THIS is distinguished by the prefix a simple encoding instruction says read me or the other file, there is no massive storage of code in a new system or file.

In essence all new storage of text / files and the encoding for this to be possible is stored, on the now expanded CD or hard disk.

In fact other then recording on or using the characters, of a previous file the simple alphabet may be used in digital form on the disc repeated many times, in which case not even a previous Tex file is required.

The following is a discussion  from a colleague on his interpretation of Tonys Hypothesis
Cuthbert Compression

Th*e CuthbertE*ncrypt*ion En*gineering Co*mpression *Anagram System

Tony Cut*hbert has devised a s*oft*ware *solution* *to massively increase data storage capacity, which*h can be used on a range of devices *including floppy disc*s*,* CDs, hard drives, DVDs and enhanced op*tical st*orage discs and so o*n. The technolog*y can be applied to any digital or analogue (see subtitle above) storage system.

Take a text file or set of files (lets call it Layer01) stored on a floppy disc and occupying the entire disc. Once the disc is nearly full, a sequence of code at the end of the disc instructs the writer back to a black box containing a set of algorithms. In order to start writing the next file on the same disc, the first algorithm (which can be very simple), instructs the computer to create the next file using the existing letters in File 01.

It might do this by tagging characters or words in Layer01 with a ‘*’ prefix to indicate they are part of Layer02.Or it may have a formula with a simple (or complex) heuristic for creating the Layer02, still using the text initially created in Layer01. Once Layer02 has used the maximum capacity available to it on the disc, the sequence of code at the end of the disc takes the writer back to the black box. Another algorithm is invoked, and the underlying text is then used again as the basis for the next layer, layer03. This can go on for a large number of layers, each time using a different strategy for creating the next layer. It is not only Layer01 that can be so used. Later layers might uses these technique on the text in Layer01, Layer02 or Layer306745, and on to Layer 10^n.

The algorithms are defined in a large number of short sections of code in a black box which determines the read/write device’s strategy. These same algorithms are then invoked to read the relevant file. The system implies a set of standard black boxes programmed with exactly the same algorithms on all PCs, PDAs and terminals. These algorithms take up very little space.One can have meta-algorithms which encapsulate whole sets of sub algorithms, thereby increasing the total number of coding strategies available.

Whi/l/e /the /system/ can and does /t/ake advantage of the norma/l redundancy in normal electronic storage devices, this unused storage space is not the constraint. The bul/k/ of the additiona/l stor/age is crea/t/ed by algo/rithmic strategies used in creating new files using existing text. Tony sees this as a gigantic anagram.

The coding in this note only uses redundancy to create embedded messages, thereby taking up more space on the existing storage medium. Other heuristics involving mathematical sequencing, transforming symbols and so no, would not do so.